skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Inky and tentacled
About Me
Now reading
Archives
-
▼
2006
(203)
-
▼
October
(19)
- How to watch The Wizard of Oz with a not-quite-4-y...
- The crouching monster
- Red and black notes
- Ghost
- Got her tongue
- Drama unleashed
- The Dodecahedron, in brief
- My Gorey death
- The horrors of Dumas, and others
- "Une mouche"
- Manguel's library
- My father's moustache
- Nobel games
- A book and a movie
- Be good and behave
- Giving thanks
- Reading group project the next
- Fractious
- "Snakes and fire"
-
▼
October
(19)
Blogs on Books
- Asylum
- Biblibio
- Biblioklept
- Bookpuddle
- Books, Inq
- Caravana de recuerdos
- Dolce Bellezza
- Edward Champion's Reluctant Habits
- His Futile Preoccupations
- Indextrious Reader, The
- Lark Writes
- Literary Saloon, The
- Maud Newton
- Mental Multivitamin
- MobyLives
- Mookse and the Gripes, The
- Nonsuch Book
- Pages Turned
- Pechorin's Journal
- Reading Matters
- Robert Pinsky Poetry Forum
- Thumb Drives and Oven Clocks
- Time's Flow Stemmed
- Tony's Book World
- Waggish
- Work in Progress, A
Also Reading
4 comments:
What's a mouche?
A fly isn't it?
I wonder if she decided before, during or after drawing it.
Yes, it's a fly.
And Pearl, while I wasn't present for the creation of this one, generally these days Helena decides before or within the first few strokes of putting pen/crayon to paper what she's going to draw. It wasn't that long ago she'd scribble and call it something depending what it looked like, and she might say it's something different mere hours later. That's the thing I find most interesting: knowing there's an intent now and seeing how the execution measures up to her concept.
cool. How great is that, to get to witness that development. :)
Post a Comment