I told you so.
Monday, May 31, 2004
ABCs
Helena's had another lightbulb moment.
Suddenly, she loves The Alphabet Song (you know the one: A B C D E F G, H I J K . . .). When I start singing it (this song, and no other), it inspires vigorous dancing and — here's the lightbulb — pointing and tapping on the newly acquired large magnetic letters on the fridge.
No, she's not tapping on the corresponding letters as they're being sung, but, hey, what do you expect? She's only 18 months old.

That's my baby!
Suddenly, she loves The Alphabet Song (you know the one: A B C D E F G, H I J K . . .). When I start singing it (this song, and no other), it inspires vigorous dancing and — here's the lightbulb — pointing and tapping on the newly acquired large magnetic letters on the fridge.
No, she's not tapping on the corresponding letters as they're being sung, but, hey, what do you expect? She's only 18 months old.

That's my baby!
I, moviegoing, smoked-meat-eating mother
We retrieved Helena Saturday morning. Our break from each other was a little too long. I missed her terribly.
Now that we're home, she won't stop following me around, and that's kind of nice.
Helena has a very big bruised bump on her forehead. Apparently she slipped and fell down the bottom four stairs. I wanted to scream and point fingers, but I took a deep breath and realized it wouldn't make any difference. I didn't bother to ask for more details. Helena was in high spirits, no bones broken. J-F meanwhile chose to scream and point fingers. Sigh.
Of course,it was great to have a night out on the town, so to speak, just the two of us. After much drinking, we needed food.
We headed to Ben's Delicatessen. (We prefer Schwartz's, but Ben's is around the corner from the cinema. Still, we end up there once or twice a year.) J-F usually starts into some hockey anecdotes, inspired by the signed photos on the wall. This time, we were seated along the Celebrity Wall of Fame, and we got a good look for the first time. It seems Ben's patrons have included such diverse characters as Catherine Deneuve, Liberace, Colonel Saunders, and Iron Maiden.
The movie was entertaining but far less than great. I feel a little misled by its title — I'm a sucker for a post-apocalyptic movie, the apocalypse itself I don't particularly care for.
What I miss most about going out to the movies is seeing trailers. I'm looking forward to I, Robot. It's the first science fiction I ever read — assigned reading in grade 7, can you believe? (I think it was part of an ethics module.) Time to revisit the past's future.
I don't remember anything of the stories, but the three laws of robotics have stuck with me:
1. A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm.
2. A robot must obey orders given it by human beings except where such orders would conflict with the First Law.
3. A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law.
There's enough of the stories both in my subconscious memory and in the movie version that seconds into the trailer I was saying to J-F, "Hey, it's I, Robot."
Now that we're home, she won't stop following me around, and that's kind of nice.
Helena has a very big bruised bump on her forehead. Apparently she slipped and fell down the bottom four stairs. I wanted to scream and point fingers, but I took a deep breath and realized it wouldn't make any difference. I didn't bother to ask for more details. Helena was in high spirits, no bones broken. J-F meanwhile chose to scream and point fingers. Sigh.
Of course,it was great to have a night out on the town, so to speak, just the two of us. After much drinking, we needed food.
We headed to Ben's Delicatessen. (We prefer Schwartz's, but Ben's is around the corner from the cinema. Still, we end up there once or twice a year.) J-F usually starts into some hockey anecdotes, inspired by the signed photos on the wall. This time, we were seated along the Celebrity Wall of Fame, and we got a good look for the first time. It seems Ben's patrons have included such diverse characters as Catherine Deneuve, Liberace, Colonel Saunders, and Iron Maiden.
The movie was entertaining but far less than great. I feel a little misled by its title — I'm a sucker for a post-apocalyptic movie, the apocalypse itself I don't particularly care for.
What I miss most about going out to the movies is seeing trailers. I'm looking forward to I, Robot. It's the first science fiction I ever read — assigned reading in grade 7, can you believe? (I think it was part of an ethics module.) Time to revisit the past's future.
I don't remember anything of the stories, but the three laws of robotics have stuck with me:
1. A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm.
2. A robot must obey orders given it by human beings except where such orders would conflict with the First Law.
3. A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law.
There's enough of the stories both in my subconscious memory and in the movie version that seconds into the trailer I was saying to J-F, "Hey, it's I, Robot."
Saturday, May 29, 2004
The day after The Day After Tomorrow
There was much destruction. But at least someone saved the Gutenberg Bible (and for reasons having nothing do with God!).
Friday, May 28, 2004
Lazy Friday with nothing to do
I miss my baby. But I am enjoying not having to be "on."
I even lingered in bed this morning. I'm currently reading Perdido Street Station, by China MiƩville, and loving it. By page 9 I'd decided to read it with pencil in hand to mark all the words I don't know: termagant, harridan, susurrus, judder, grot, syncresis, sortilege, oneiric, abseil. So many words!
How does one come to write a world so intricately imagined? I picture the author hovering over a topographical map, moving action figures along trains and rivers, stopping to examine the shadows of detailed models of buildings and market stalls. Admiring the landscape.
Harry Potter fans should brace themselves for the character's death. Who would have better insight into the character than the kid actor who plays him? "The only way Voldemort could die is if Harry dies as well."
Oprah on Monday is to announce her choice for summer reading. My guess: Anna Karenina. You heard it here first. Can she do that? Put her stamp on a new edition of this classic?
Which translation? The accessible Pevear and Volokhonsky? Has she commissioned a new translation? Does she realize how important translation is?
I don't know why people are so intimidated by it. Sure, it's big, but it's just life and love — one long gut-wrenching, tear-jerking soap opera.
I'm surprised not to be hearing more on yesterday's statement from Michael Moore regarding the 20 minutes of footage of Nicholas Berg he filmed for Fahrenheit 9/11.
I even lingered in bed this morning. I'm currently reading Perdido Street Station, by China MiƩville, and loving it. By page 9 I'd decided to read it with pencil in hand to mark all the words I don't know: termagant, harridan, susurrus, judder, grot, syncresis, sortilege, oneiric, abseil. So many words!
How does one come to write a world so intricately imagined? I picture the author hovering over a topographical map, moving action figures along trains and rivers, stopping to examine the shadows of detailed models of buildings and market stalls. Admiring the landscape.
Harry Potter fans should brace themselves for the character's death. Who would have better insight into the character than the kid actor who plays him? "The only way Voldemort could die is if Harry dies as well."
Oprah on Monday is to announce her choice for summer reading. My guess: Anna Karenina. You heard it here first. Can she do that? Put her stamp on a new edition of this classic?
Which translation? The accessible Pevear and Volokhonsky? Has she commissioned a new translation? Does she realize how important translation is?
I don't know why people are so intimidated by it. Sure, it's big, but it's just life and love — one long gut-wrenching, tear-jerking soap opera.
I'm surprised not to be hearing more on yesterday's statement from Michael Moore regarding the 20 minutes of footage of Nicholas Berg he filmed for Fahrenheit 9/11.
Thursday, May 27, 2004
What's that buzzing noise?
I feel like someone was hammering away at my tooth all morning. Wait a minute. Yes, that actually happened. Root canal part two is behind me. To be continued.
The cicadas have descended upon Washington, D.C. Take a few moments to educate yourself about this threat to national security.
The house (by which I mean this tiny apartment) is toddler-free for a couple days. But at least I know Helena's safe at her grandmother's house and not lost in the cicada-strewn streets.
The creator of the Artemis Fowl series is out having a drink and a chat.
Children love it, perhaps because they're also like fairies, darting about beneath adult surveillance. They may have to abide by some inexplicable adult rules, but they're normally far more adept in the world of microchips and basic video-programming than their parents. "I'm very keen on not writing down to children," says Colfer. "They all use computers and watch Ally McBeal."
And there's going to be a movie! Oh, goody!
The cicadas have descended upon Washington, D.C. Take a few moments to educate yourself about this threat to national security.
The house (by which I mean this tiny apartment) is toddler-free for a couple days. But at least I know Helena's safe at her grandmother's house and not lost in the cicada-strewn streets.
The creator of the Artemis Fowl series is out having a drink and a chat.
Children love it, perhaps because they're also like fairies, darting about beneath adult surveillance. They may have to abide by some inexplicable adult rules, but they're normally far more adept in the world of microchips and basic video-programming than their parents. "I'm very keen on not writing down to children," says Colfer. "They all use computers and watch Ally McBeal."
And there's going to be a movie! Oh, goody!
Waldorf
Helena won't be going to school for a few years yet, but naturally I fret over the education she's going to have. I fret even that I've begun fretting a little late in the game.
I fret about the state of public schools. I used to believe that the public school system we had was a good one. My public-school education served me well; I even had the benefit of special education — of an open-concept, self-directed, advanced variety — for a few years and a good music program.
But there's no point in denying that times have changed. Funding is lacking. Educational standards are lacking. School buildings are being converted into condos.
I've toyed with the idea of home-schooling Helena, but I know I'm not up to the challenge. I wonder, though, if grade-school teachers are any better equipped for this task.
I don't know anything about the school system in this province. I'm bothered by the fact that Helena will be starting school at least a year later than I think is usual.
Of course, it's time to start educating myself about the rules and regulations, about the school districts, and not least about the standards of education and alternatives to public schooling.
So it was with interest that I read this article on the Waldorf system. (Set aside the fact that the article can't quite make up its mind what it's about.)
Waldorf education — a holistic, media-minimal and arts-based alternative to traditional schooling that's said to foster creativity, independent thinking and mind-body-spirit wholeness in its students.
Sounds nice.
But it turns out that the founder was a self-proclaimed clairvoyant and occult scientist who founded a philosophy with a mystical twist on Christianity, incorporating reincarnation, karma, and gnomes. (The website of the Anthroposophical Society of America is uninformative. I really want to know more about these gnomes.)
It seems parents are upset not so much about the "spirituality" that pervades the entire system as about the lack of disclosure regarding it.
Still, any program of education that sets out to produce well-rounded individuals itself ought to be well-rounded, to nurture mind, body, and spirit. It should include an arts component. I'm not convinced it need exclude media in this day and age.
To me the most troublesome aspect of the Waldorf program is that it delays reading till age 7 and academics till age 14. These "arbitrary" ages are based on the founder's spiritual principles, not at all on science.
The official website for Waldorf schools has this to say:
There is evidence that normal, healthy children who learn to read relatively late are not disadvantaged by this, but rather are able quickly to catch up with, and may overtake, children who have learned to read early. Additionally, they are much less likely to develop the “tiredness toward reading” that many children taught to read at a very early age experience later on. Instead there is lively interest in reading and learning that continues into adulthood.
Show me that evidence. "Tiredness toward reading" has nothing to do with age or readiness and everything to do with boredom — the ability of a curriculum to be appropriately engaging and challenging.
And so the search for a proper education begins...
I fret about the state of public schools. I used to believe that the public school system we had was a good one. My public-school education served me well; I even had the benefit of special education — of an open-concept, self-directed, advanced variety — for a few years and a good music program.
But there's no point in denying that times have changed. Funding is lacking. Educational standards are lacking. School buildings are being converted into condos.
I've toyed with the idea of home-schooling Helena, but I know I'm not up to the challenge. I wonder, though, if grade-school teachers are any better equipped for this task.
I don't know anything about the school system in this province. I'm bothered by the fact that Helena will be starting school at least a year later than I think is usual.
Of course, it's time to start educating myself about the rules and regulations, about the school districts, and not least about the standards of education and alternatives to public schooling.
So it was with interest that I read this article on the Waldorf system. (Set aside the fact that the article can't quite make up its mind what it's about.)
Waldorf education — a holistic, media-minimal and arts-based alternative to traditional schooling that's said to foster creativity, independent thinking and mind-body-spirit wholeness in its students.
Sounds nice.
But it turns out that the founder was a self-proclaimed clairvoyant and occult scientist who founded a philosophy with a mystical twist on Christianity, incorporating reincarnation, karma, and gnomes. (The website of the Anthroposophical Society of America is uninformative. I really want to know more about these gnomes.)
It seems parents are upset not so much about the "spirituality" that pervades the entire system as about the lack of disclosure regarding it.
Still, any program of education that sets out to produce well-rounded individuals itself ought to be well-rounded, to nurture mind, body, and spirit. It should include an arts component. I'm not convinced it need exclude media in this day and age.
To me the most troublesome aspect of the Waldorf program is that it delays reading till age 7 and academics till age 14. These "arbitrary" ages are based on the founder's spiritual principles, not at all on science.
The official website for Waldorf schools has this to say:
There is evidence that normal, healthy children who learn to read relatively late are not disadvantaged by this, but rather are able quickly to catch up with, and may overtake, children who have learned to read early. Additionally, they are much less likely to develop the “tiredness toward reading” that many children taught to read at a very early age experience later on. Instead there is lively interest in reading and learning that continues into adulthood.
Show me that evidence. "Tiredness toward reading" has nothing to do with age or readiness and everything to do with boredom — the ability of a curriculum to be appropriately engaging and challenging.
And so the search for a proper education begins...
Search me
Here's a list of the some of the weird searches (Google and other) that have led people to this blog:
- shut up shut shut up shut up (What reason could anyone possibly have for entering this as a search term?)
- brain octopus
- is a child's fascination with pantyhose normal?
- david letterman baboon on his desk
- pantyhose porn
- lego porn
- autism poo visual schedule
- illuminati sacrifice adrenal
- schlepping new yorkers significant technological development disastrous ubiquitous (They must have had something specific in mind...)
- aggressive squirrels and strollers
- shut up shut shut up shut up (What reason could anyone possibly have for entering this as a search term?)
- brain octopus
- is a child's fascination with pantyhose normal?
- david letterman baboon on his desk
- pantyhose porn
- lego porn
- autism poo visual schedule
- illuminati sacrifice adrenal
- schlepping new yorkers significant technological development disastrous ubiquitous (They must have had something specific in mind...)
- aggressive squirrels and strollers
Wednesday, May 26, 2004
Fractured
My tooth was fractured. I know not how that came to pass, though I am reminded of how much I hate sleeping with Helena cuz she kicks me in the face.
Dental procedures have begun. The tooth nerve was extracted. I wanted to see what the dead nerve looked like, but then I forgot to ask, or I lost my nerve.
I am unnerved by the fact that the dentist at the emergency clinic and the dentist whom I usually see told me different, almost contradictory, things. I feel I have little choice but to trust my dentist even though that trust has been shaken. I feel that very worst of all possible feelings: not in control.
Owing to poor planning and shitty timing, I had to take Helena with me to the dental clinic. I'm extremely proud of the little monkey; she kept herself quietly entertained for a full hour.
Have I mentioned how much Helena enjoys the word "pen"? She says "pen" with such glee whenever she finds one, which in this house is very often. This week Helena has discovered that crayons are for more than chewing on; she has taken up scribbling with a vengeance.
Scribbling Woman posted links aplenty on pens. I think it's pretty neat that people feel so strongly about their pens, and their notebooks too. I used to take my pens very seriously — occupational hazard — but not so much anymore. Primarily because I no longer edit on hardcopy. I've loved many notebooks, too, saving them up for something "special." Now I buy notebooks at the dollar store and I use them all the time for taking notes: comments on anything that strikes me, whenever it strikes me. I even take notes on things I intend to get around to blogging about later. Once I've dealt with a particular set of notes, transferring comments to the appropriate forum or completing the to-do list or discounting a theory as silly and alcohol-induced, I tend to rip out the pages and destroy them.
Bookninja indicates a list of mathematical fiction, and we all know that math + fiction = freakin' good time. I question the inclusion of some works, but seeing as how I'm familiar with but a handful or two of these works, I'll hang on to this list as a springboard for future reading. One oversight obvious to me is t zero, by Italo Calvino.
In a second I'll know if the arrow's trajectory and the lion's will or will not coincide at a point X crossed by L and by A at the same second tx...
The short story "t zero" is about that second.
Coincidentally (have I mentioned that I believe in the interconnectedness of all things?), Bookninja also links to an essay on the experience of reading and rereading Italo Calvino's If on a Winter's Night a Traveller:
My conclusions, for what they are worth, are: some books are best loved when young; the older me has more time for Calvino the fabulist (Our Ancestors), Calvino the short-story writer (Adam, One Afternoon) or Calvino the essayist (Six Memos for the Next Millennium) than for Calvino the Escher; and that however breathtakingly inventive a book is, it is only breathtakingly inventive once. But once is better than never.
Often, once is more than enough.
Have I mentioned that I was once just outside the town of Malbork? ("Outside the Town of Malbork" is the title of one of the chapters the protagonist You reads under the mistaken impression that is the continuation of the book If on a Winter's Night a Traveller You is reading.)(Circumstances conspired to keep me from visiting the castle therein.)
Have I mentioned that my cat's name is Calvino?
Dental procedures have begun. The tooth nerve was extracted. I wanted to see what the dead nerve looked like, but then I forgot to ask, or I lost my nerve.
I am unnerved by the fact that the dentist at the emergency clinic and the dentist whom I usually see told me different, almost contradictory, things. I feel I have little choice but to trust my dentist even though that trust has been shaken. I feel that very worst of all possible feelings: not in control.
Owing to poor planning and shitty timing, I had to take Helena with me to the dental clinic. I'm extremely proud of the little monkey; she kept herself quietly entertained for a full hour.
Have I mentioned how much Helena enjoys the word "pen"? She says "pen" with such glee whenever she finds one, which in this house is very often. This week Helena has discovered that crayons are for more than chewing on; she has taken up scribbling with a vengeance.
Scribbling Woman posted links aplenty on pens. I think it's pretty neat that people feel so strongly about their pens, and their notebooks too. I used to take my pens very seriously — occupational hazard — but not so much anymore. Primarily because I no longer edit on hardcopy. I've loved many notebooks, too, saving them up for something "special." Now I buy notebooks at the dollar store and I use them all the time for taking notes: comments on anything that strikes me, whenever it strikes me. I even take notes on things I intend to get around to blogging about later. Once I've dealt with a particular set of notes, transferring comments to the appropriate forum or completing the to-do list or discounting a theory as silly and alcohol-induced, I tend to rip out the pages and destroy them.
Bookninja indicates a list of mathematical fiction, and we all know that math + fiction = freakin' good time. I question the inclusion of some works, but seeing as how I'm familiar with but a handful or two of these works, I'll hang on to this list as a springboard for future reading. One oversight obvious to me is t zero, by Italo Calvino.
In a second I'll know if the arrow's trajectory and the lion's will or will not coincide at a point X crossed by L and by A at the same second tx...
The short story "t zero" is about that second.
Coincidentally (have I mentioned that I believe in the interconnectedness of all things?), Bookninja also links to an essay on the experience of reading and rereading Italo Calvino's If on a Winter's Night a Traveller:
My conclusions, for what they are worth, are: some books are best loved when young; the older me has more time for Calvino the fabulist (Our Ancestors), Calvino the short-story writer (Adam, One Afternoon) or Calvino the essayist (Six Memos for the Next Millennium) than for Calvino the Escher; and that however breathtakingly inventive a book is, it is only breathtakingly inventive once. But once is better than never.
Often, once is more than enough.
Have I mentioned that I was once just outside the town of Malbork? ("Outside the Town of Malbork" is the title of one of the chapters the protagonist You reads under the mistaken impression that is the continuation of the book If on a Winter's Night a Traveller You is reading.)(Circumstances conspired to keep me from visiting the castle therein.)
Have I mentioned that my cat's name is Calvino?
The blog habit
When I go out of town, I go into blog withdrawal (posting here as well as reading other blogs). Now that I'm back, I'm having trouble reestablishing the rhythm. My mind is a fog of pain, painkillers, exhaustion, and a general world-weariness: the point of just about anything is obfuscated.
Here and now, I will reembark on the blogging exercise with renewed vigour. Because I say so. Even though I don't really feel like it today.
I remind myself why I do this.
1. To record for posterity Helena's development.
2. To record for my own amusement the complexities of motherhood — my convoluted experience of motherhood, anyway.
3. To write, for writing's own sake.
4. To exploit hypertext in recording the news and opinions that shape my life.
5. To enforce an active search for information and inspiration.
6. To help me maintain some level of analytical thinking and critical evaluation.
7. To give my day (as distinct from Helena's) shape, and some diversion.
Here and now, I will reembark on the blogging exercise with renewed vigour. Because I say so. Even though I don't really feel like it today.
I remind myself why I do this.
1. To record for posterity Helena's development.
2. To record for my own amusement the complexities of motherhood — my convoluted experience of motherhood, anyway.
3. To write, for writing's own sake.
4. To exploit hypertext in recording the news and opinions that shape my life.
5. To enforce an active search for information and inspiration.
6. To help me maintain some level of analytical thinking and critical evaluation.
7. To give my day (as distinct from Helena's) shape, and some diversion.
Sunday, May 23, 2004
Moon milk and music
My sister had a present for Helena, a book I'd espied earlier this month.
(It reminds us both of a book from my own childhood,
Wiersze dla Kaji, by Joanna Kulmowa and illustrated by Janusz Grabianski. Full of whimsy and wonder, text and illustrations both.)
Kitten's First Full Moon, by Kevin Henkes, is utterly charming. Henkes has the inspired notion that Kitten sees the round white moon as the ultimate bowl of milk.
The review in The New York Times describes the flavour of the drawings. "Henkes uses the advantages of today's printing technology with care and a well-disciplined eye."
The pictures are creamy and dreamy. The text is simple and repetitive (in a good way). And there's a kitten!
The book is a hit with Helena. Repeatedly she offered it up to my sister and urged to be sat on her lap and read to. Helena sat rapt for the whole story. Twice.
I was jealous. Why would Helena sit still for my sister but not me? What was I doing wrong? To my relief, Helena's reading habits soon returned to squirmy normal. But she's improving every week.
Helena's enunciation is also much improved. We have "cheek," "down," "babcia" (grandmother), "ciocia" (aunt), "delicious," and "Where do you think you're going with that?"
J-F meanwhile is becoming an expert astronomer, to help Helena with her astronaut studies.
The universe is 156 billion light-years wide! (I think they mean in diameter.)
There's ice on Mercury.
What do you do with a piece of the Moon?
Brian Greene talks about life, the universe, and everything — and string theory — in interview at The Atlantic Online.
Inside an electron, inside a quark, inside any particle that you've ever heard of, there is something else. It's a little filament, a little filament of vibrating energy. It kind of looks like a tiny, tiny vibrating string, which is why we call the theory "string theory." The wonderful idea is that in the same way the string on a violin can vibrate in different patterns, which our ears would hear as different musical notes, these little strings in string theory also can vibrate in different patterns. They don't produce different notes, however; they produce the different particles. So an electron is the string vibrating one way. A quark would be a string vibrating a different way. It's kind of like a music of the spheres injected into the microscopic makeup of the universe.
(It reminds us both of a book from my own childhood,
Wiersze dla Kaji, by Joanna Kulmowa and illustrated by Janusz Grabianski. Full of whimsy and wonder, text and illustrations both.)
Kitten's First Full Moon, by Kevin Henkes, is utterly charming. Henkes has the inspired notion that Kitten sees the round white moon as the ultimate bowl of milk.
The review in The New York Times describes the flavour of the drawings. "Henkes uses the advantages of today's printing technology with care and a well-disciplined eye."
The pictures are creamy and dreamy. The text is simple and repetitive (in a good way). And there's a kitten!
The book is a hit with Helena. Repeatedly she offered it up to my sister and urged to be sat on her lap and read to. Helena sat rapt for the whole story. Twice.
I was jealous. Why would Helena sit still for my sister but not me? What was I doing wrong? To my relief, Helena's reading habits soon returned to squirmy normal. But she's improving every week.
Helena's enunciation is also much improved. We have "cheek," "down," "babcia" (grandmother), "ciocia" (aunt), "delicious," and "Where do you think you're going with that?"
J-F meanwhile is becoming an expert astronomer, to help Helena with her astronaut studies.
The universe is 156 billion light-years wide! (I think they mean in diameter.)
There's ice on Mercury.
What do you do with a piece of the Moon?
Brian Greene talks about life, the universe, and everything — and string theory — in interview at The Atlantic Online.
Inside an electron, inside a quark, inside any particle that you've ever heard of, there is something else. It's a little filament, a little filament of vibrating energy. It kind of looks like a tiny, tiny vibrating string, which is why we call the theory "string theory." The wonderful idea is that in the same way the string on a violin can vibrate in different patterns, which our ears would hear as different musical notes, these little strings in string theory also can vibrate in different patterns. They don't produce different notes, however; they produce the different particles. So an electron is the string vibrating one way. A quark would be a string vibrating a different way. It's kind of like a music of the spheres injected into the microscopic makeup of the universe.
Saturday, May 22, 2004
The salmon of no return
I'm home and exhausted.
For nine days I changed every diaper but one (when I was at the emergency dental clinic). I prepared and administered every meal, except the one where my aunt spoonfed Helena two and a half bowls of jello ("It's only water." — umm, what about the pouch of fine crystals you poured into the bowl?). I alternately read to, sat with, rocked, and sang to Helena till she fell asleep, on average an hour and a half past her usual bedtime. I was there when she was up an at 'em every morning at ten to six.
I ensured Helena's pleasant disposition for the better part of a seven-and-a-half-hour train journey, each way, with only the last half hour a steady stream of desperate wailing. I was armed with activity toys but none captured Helena's attention like the safety information card. Once she found her train legs she amassed quite a collection of these from neighbouring seat pouches.
My tooth no longer feels like a gaping chasm, pulsating outward against an imaginary restraint jacket of dental floss. There's a huge lump on my jaw. Now it just feels like the tooth is locked in a vise, with the screw tightened every couple of hours.
I'm looking forward to having a root canal this week because Helena will stay with my mother-in-law for a night. I'll read a chapter or two at the dentist's office. Then I'll come home and sleep guilt-free. Pain-inspired, drug-induced sleep. Guilt-free.
All in all, our trip was rather pleasant. It's just my tooth has coloured everything a little cranky.
It so happened that the Niagara Folk Arts Festival got under way last weekend. (Do organizers have any idea how hideous the website is?) That brought on a flood of memories of our respective childhoods and formative years. We determined to attend the Polish open house for old times' sake, for a drink, maybe see some familiar faces, but mostly to show off Helena. Sadly, we arrived after the dance performances (we're told they were sluggish). The crowd was less a crowd than a collection of sad and weird-looking old people. At least the bar was open (we didn't bother staying long enough to enjoy it, however). A local shop had some wares on display; my sister bought a DVD.
We settled in one evening to watch U Pana Boga za Piecem. Once I got past the speed of their banter, the accents, and the regional dialect, it was kind of funny.
Here's something odd. A mother asks the priest if it's OK for her daughter to wear a white wedding dress. The daughter is obviously with child. The priest allows it, commenting that at least the daughter didn't succumb to the greater sin of contraception. I thought that was pretty funny. But the odd thing is I don't know if that was meant to be a joke. Were the moviemakers moralizing or mocking? That's the problem with knowing a second language — you can never fully know it when you are removed form its sociocultural context.
Last night J-F and I tuned into The WB's Superstar USA. "The best singers were sent home while a gang of hopefuls, with more guts than talent, were chosen." J-F's been dreaming of this program since we saw the very first episode of American Idol. The only good reason to watch that show, after all, was to see people make complete fools of themselves in the audition. J-F's in heaven. Can so many people really not hear how awful they sound and still be so cocky? Such ignorance deserves our mockery, says he.
Have I mentioned that I believe in the interconnectedness of all things? I shouldn't be surprised to find mention of Douglas Adams everywhere in recent days, on the anniversary of his death. I shouldn't be surprised that just a day later I am unable to find any of those references. I shouldn't be surprised that The Salmon of Doubt was destined to be my vacation reading.
The book itself was enjoyable, a collection of essays and some work in progress, sensibly divided into three sections: Life, The Universe, and Everything. I saw another aspect of the man who was inadvertently responsible for my drinking about five too many pangalactic gargleblasters on my 20th birthday. I got to know that he was a bit of a computer geek and science guy, and even this was entertaining.
The thing that really made me wing through all the essay stuff (many previously published but never before collected in one volume) was the promise of another Dirk Gently adventure. There were only a few chapters, a number of which Adams would likely have reworked, and no resolution. (Weirdly, the plot reminds of Paul Auster's work.)
My favourite sentence: "Silent Mexicans moved over impossibly perfect lawns."
No doubting salmon here.
For nine days I changed every diaper but one (when I was at the emergency dental clinic). I prepared and administered every meal, except the one where my aunt spoonfed Helena two and a half bowls of jello ("It's only water." — umm, what about the pouch of fine crystals you poured into the bowl?). I alternately read to, sat with, rocked, and sang to Helena till she fell asleep, on average an hour and a half past her usual bedtime. I was there when she was up an at 'em every morning at ten to six.
I ensured Helena's pleasant disposition for the better part of a seven-and-a-half-hour train journey, each way, with only the last half hour a steady stream of desperate wailing. I was armed with activity toys but none captured Helena's attention like the safety information card. Once she found her train legs she amassed quite a collection of these from neighbouring seat pouches.
My tooth no longer feels like a gaping chasm, pulsating outward against an imaginary restraint jacket of dental floss. There's a huge lump on my jaw. Now it just feels like the tooth is locked in a vise, with the screw tightened every couple of hours.
I'm looking forward to having a root canal this week because Helena will stay with my mother-in-law for a night. I'll read a chapter or two at the dentist's office. Then I'll come home and sleep guilt-free. Pain-inspired, drug-induced sleep. Guilt-free.
All in all, our trip was rather pleasant. It's just my tooth has coloured everything a little cranky.
It so happened that the Niagara Folk Arts Festival got under way last weekend. (Do organizers have any idea how hideous the website is?) That brought on a flood of memories of our respective childhoods and formative years. We determined to attend the Polish open house for old times' sake, for a drink, maybe see some familiar faces, but mostly to show off Helena. Sadly, we arrived after the dance performances (we're told they were sluggish). The crowd was less a crowd than a collection of sad and weird-looking old people. At least the bar was open (we didn't bother staying long enough to enjoy it, however). A local shop had some wares on display; my sister bought a DVD.
We settled in one evening to watch U Pana Boga za Piecem. Once I got past the speed of their banter, the accents, and the regional dialect, it was kind of funny.
Here's something odd. A mother asks the priest if it's OK for her daughter to wear a white wedding dress. The daughter is obviously with child. The priest allows it, commenting that at least the daughter didn't succumb to the greater sin of contraception. I thought that was pretty funny. But the odd thing is I don't know if that was meant to be a joke. Were the moviemakers moralizing or mocking? That's the problem with knowing a second language — you can never fully know it when you are removed form its sociocultural context.
Last night J-F and I tuned into The WB's Superstar USA. "The best singers were sent home while a gang of hopefuls, with more guts than talent, were chosen." J-F's been dreaming of this program since we saw the very first episode of American Idol. The only good reason to watch that show, after all, was to see people make complete fools of themselves in the audition. J-F's in heaven. Can so many people really not hear how awful they sound and still be so cocky? Such ignorance deserves our mockery, says he.
Have I mentioned that I believe in the interconnectedness of all things? I shouldn't be surprised to find mention of Douglas Adams everywhere in recent days, on the anniversary of his death. I shouldn't be surprised that just a day later I am unable to find any of those references. I shouldn't be surprised that The Salmon of Doubt was destined to be my vacation reading.
The book itself was enjoyable, a collection of essays and some work in progress, sensibly divided into three sections: Life, The Universe, and Everything. I saw another aspect of the man who was inadvertently responsible for my drinking about five too many pangalactic gargleblasters on my 20th birthday. I got to know that he was a bit of a computer geek and science guy, and even this was entertaining.
The thing that really made me wing through all the essay stuff (many previously published but never before collected in one volume) was the promise of another Dirk Gently adventure. There were only a few chapters, a number of which Adams would likely have reworked, and no resolution. (Weirdly, the plot reminds of Paul Auster's work.)
My favourite sentence: "Silent Mexicans moved over impossibly perfect lawns."
No doubting salmon here.
Tuesday, May 18, 2004
Thoughts from someplace else entirely
The world seems to have come to a standstill.
No news of anything for some reason, no daily routine, no new projects. My brain is on hold and I can only assume having Muzak piped in. No insight into anything. Just a steady stream of intense pain.
I've never had a toothache before. It started Friday. I chalked it up to stress — the tired feeling after a long journey, the difficulty of quieting Helena at night, the attempt to be social with my brother (who insisted we watch Kill Bill even though I've seen it, he's seen it a number of times, and my mother would live a happier life never having seen it — only my sister had any interest, but that waned when she realized the constant and meaningless running commentary ("Oh, watch this carefully. This is classic!") it would involve).
Saturday's pain was gawdawful. Sunday was better. Monday we headed to Toronto. On arrival, I headed to an emergency dental clinic.
Turns out the nerve is inflamed and in the process of dying. The nerve of that nerve! But poor nerve, really. No means of releasing its anguish. Trapped in its enamel casing, banging on the walls with all its might. Well, I hear you, nerve. We're gonna scrape you outta there. You'll be dead by then, but free.
The staff at the clinic were extremely sympathetic, and not only was the dentist cute cute charming cute, he laughed at all my jokes: "So it's not just commiserating with my baby girl with sympathetic teething pain." "Yes, that's the tooth... Yes... Mmm, ya, I'm 100% sure... Yes... No, wait a minute — could you please hit all my teeth with that blunt instrument again? It might not be the one that makes me scream after all." "Was lovely to meet you. Hope I never see you again."
I'll be easing my way from (mind-numbingly achingly throbbing) vacation to real life with a root canal in a few days.
My cousin thinks I need more drugs. I tend to agree. I hesitate, though, because it's me who's primarily responsible for Helena. The pain is lessened, I find, when I'm distracted (hence this post), but it's difficult to find suitable distraction while in a foreign space — I've been dissuaded from scrubbing the kitchen floor and I'd be thought rude to just pick up and go hang out at the bookstore (assuming I could find one).
At least Helena is able to spend some quality time with her extended family. She continues to charm the pants off everybody.
I'm reading Douglas Adams' The Salmon of Doubt when I have free moments, and when the pain lets up enough to not consume every fibre of my being, allowing just a small bit of my brain to run carefree and wild.
No news of anything for some reason, no daily routine, no new projects. My brain is on hold and I can only assume having Muzak piped in. No insight into anything. Just a steady stream of intense pain.
I've never had a toothache before. It started Friday. I chalked it up to stress — the tired feeling after a long journey, the difficulty of quieting Helena at night, the attempt to be social with my brother (who insisted we watch Kill Bill even though I've seen it, he's seen it a number of times, and my mother would live a happier life never having seen it — only my sister had any interest, but that waned when she realized the constant and meaningless running commentary ("Oh, watch this carefully. This is classic!") it would involve).
Saturday's pain was gawdawful. Sunday was better. Monday we headed to Toronto. On arrival, I headed to an emergency dental clinic.
Turns out the nerve is inflamed and in the process of dying. The nerve of that nerve! But poor nerve, really. No means of releasing its anguish. Trapped in its enamel casing, banging on the walls with all its might. Well, I hear you, nerve. We're gonna scrape you outta there. You'll be dead by then, but free.
The staff at the clinic were extremely sympathetic, and not only was the dentist cute cute charming cute, he laughed at all my jokes: "So it's not just commiserating with my baby girl with sympathetic teething pain." "Yes, that's the tooth... Yes... Mmm, ya, I'm 100% sure... Yes... No, wait a minute — could you please hit all my teeth with that blunt instrument again? It might not be the one that makes me scream after all." "Was lovely to meet you. Hope I never see you again."
I'll be easing my way from (mind-numbingly achingly throbbing) vacation to real life with a root canal in a few days.
My cousin thinks I need more drugs. I tend to agree. I hesitate, though, because it's me who's primarily responsible for Helena. The pain is lessened, I find, when I'm distracted (hence this post), but it's difficult to find suitable distraction while in a foreign space — I've been dissuaded from scrubbing the kitchen floor and I'd be thought rude to just pick up and go hang out at the bookstore (assuming I could find one).
At least Helena is able to spend some quality time with her extended family. She continues to charm the pants off everybody.
I'm reading Douglas Adams' The Salmon of Doubt when I have free moments, and when the pain lets up enough to not consume every fibre of my being, allowing just a small bit of my brain to run carefree and wild.
Wednesday, May 12, 2004
Tuesday, May 11, 2004
Bathtime
It was just me and Helena sharing dinner this evening. Then bathtime.
She resists being plopped down into a full tub, but loves sitting in an empty tub and letting the water rise around her.
Helena has a lot of squirty animal bath toys (maybe two inches long each). Every bath she picks out the yellow duck and the mauve seal, claps them together (makes them kiss?), and sits them side by side on the edge of the tub, in the corner, leaving them there for the duration. Twice she's tried other corners, moving them clockwise around the tub, but they always end up in the same place.
J-F promised to bring home some reading material for me for the trip. I can't wait to see what he picks out.
We're almost packed. I'm nervous. We've done this trip by train a number of times, but each time Helena's a little older and I don't know what to expect. Last trip she wasn't yet toddling. What if she won't sit still or nap? Where will all her energy go if not to the park?
She resists being plopped down into a full tub, but loves sitting in an empty tub and letting the water rise around her.
Helena has a lot of squirty animal bath toys (maybe two inches long each). Every bath she picks out the yellow duck and the mauve seal, claps them together (makes them kiss?), and sits them side by side on the edge of the tub, in the corner, leaving them there for the duration. Twice she's tried other corners, moving them clockwise around the tub, but they always end up in the same place.
J-F promised to bring home some reading material for me for the trip. I can't wait to see what he picks out.
We're almost packed. I'm nervous. We've done this trip by train a number of times, but each time Helena's a little older and I don't know what to expect. Last trip she wasn't yet toddling. What if she won't sit still or nap? Where will all her energy go if not to the park?
Lemma dilemma
About a month ago, Russian researchers announced a plan for a manned flight to Mars in 2009.
Sergei Gorbunov, spokesman for the Russian Space Agency, said he had never heard of the project and that it "was absolutely impossible" to implement with such a meager budget and in such a short time period.
Fund-raising schemes are said to involve a reality television show.
On Monday, Anatoly Perminov, Russia's space agency chief since March, expressed support for the mission to Mars — visiting the planet within a decade is realistic provided funding is adequate.
Stanislaw Lem in interview discusses politics, globalization, and film adaptations of his work.
On Bush talking about the countless riches on the Moon and Mars:
There is nothing up there. And what about the money for these space adventures? Do you think U.S. Congress will come up with hundreds of billions on a silver platter? Besides, what is the dollar really worth now? In Communist-era Poland it could buy 100 zlotys: That was some money. But now it is worth a mere 3.5 zlotys. Today I am getting more dollars for new editions of my books from Russia than from the United States. We should deal with earthly problems, not with space chimeras.
Today's space race: "This is not development but militarization, pure and simple. Moreover, it has nothing to do with the Universe."
Although the stories of science fiction are often parables of the human condition, it surprises me that a man who writes of space adventures and alien cultures does not view exploration as a worthy pursuit.
How much of the science fiction writer's work is speculative, the extension of known fact? How much is it based in the paradigm of the known world, on his worldview? How much of is pure chimera?
Sergei Gorbunov, spokesman for the Russian Space Agency, said he had never heard of the project and that it "was absolutely impossible" to implement with such a meager budget and in such a short time period.
Fund-raising schemes are said to involve a reality television show.
On Monday, Anatoly Perminov, Russia's space agency chief since March, expressed support for the mission to Mars — visiting the planet within a decade is realistic provided funding is adequate.
Stanislaw Lem in interview discusses politics, globalization, and film adaptations of his work.
On Bush talking about the countless riches on the Moon and Mars:
There is nothing up there. And what about the money for these space adventures? Do you think U.S. Congress will come up with hundreds of billions on a silver platter? Besides, what is the dollar really worth now? In Communist-era Poland it could buy 100 zlotys: That was some money. But now it is worth a mere 3.5 zlotys. Today I am getting more dollars for new editions of my books from Russia than from the United States. We should deal with earthly problems, not with space chimeras.
Today's space race: "This is not development but militarization, pure and simple. Moreover, it has nothing to do with the Universe."
Although the stories of science fiction are often parables of the human condition, it surprises me that a man who writes of space adventures and alien cultures does not view exploration as a worthy pursuit.
How much of the science fiction writer's work is speculative, the extension of known fact? How much is it based in the paradigm of the known world, on his worldview? How much of is pure chimera?
Sunday, May 09, 2004
Little Miss Fancypants
Ack. Here I was thinking I'd just jot down a few notes while I finished up this beer before heading to bed, and I'm confronted with this completely unanticipated new Blogger look and way of doing things, and just barely skimming the news updates on these changes has already made this a much longer and more painful experience than I'd planned. Sigh.
Mother's Day rocked. I am the luckiest woman alive to be the mother of that sweet, brilliant little creature. We did very little today, and even littler that was "special," but there was a little something in the air that made it magical.
Helena, as if she knew how Hallmark had designated this Sunday, an amazing feat for one not yet 18 months old, was full of spontaneous hugs and kisses.
The three of us went to the park. A very busy park day it was. It seemed a lot of suburban families treated their moms to a picnic in the city today. Didn't they move to the suburbs for the wide green spaces? If you're going to come into the city for the day, why not enjoy one of those unique city experiences, like a nice restaurant or a museum? Do they not have proper parks in the suburbs? (Mind you, this park really is exquisite.)
Helena is perhaps still a little young for the park. The sign on the gate clearly states it's for 2- to 6-year-olds. Our last few visits she's been less a participant and more an observer. Perhaps she's had another one of those lightbulb moments, albeit a less obvious one to the casual observer (OK, to anyone. I am not a casual observer; I am her mother) — something that's made her go "hmmm" and hang back so she can test a theory or perfect a technique. Perhaps she's simply too tired to be rambunctious — she still can't make up her mind whether she wants one nap a day or two (today I had three!). (I'm toying with "scheduling" the park as a morning excursion so that she's not torn between napping and playing this way, giving them each a half-assed go.) I worry that she'll grow up to be an antisocial push-over, as are both her parents. But we're working on that.
After the park, we made a side trip to return the DVD we'd rented last night (Intolerable Cruelty — I enjoyed it immensely. Very funny, both witty and silly. And George and Catherine are sssoooo sexy.) and J-F bought me a Mr. Freeze (blue) at the dĆ©panneur cuz it was almost hot outside. I had a lot of those the summer I was pregnant, but only maybe two last year. Something in the flavour makes my throat very scratchy. We found a 1-800 number on the wrapper and decided that I should call (does anyone ever call? would anyone answer?), but I promptly forgot and threw the wrapper away into the first trashcan we passed.
The only out-of-the-ordinary thing we did today was play dress-up. Kind of. Helena did the wearing, I did the dressing (J-F didn't participate). I feel like I've spent a whole month already sorting through her wardrobe: stashing away winter things and clothes that have stayed in her drawers since even before the snow; sorting those things into stuff to give away and stuff to hang on to "just in case"; pulling out season- and size-appropriate clothing from the boxes of hand-me-downs friends have given us, as well as clothing received as gifts going as far back as the baby shower. It's a tricky matter of timing, cuz today I find myself trying stuff on Helena, hoping it's not too late, hoping I haven't let a particularly fantastic gift go to waste simply by not reading the size on the label (remembering too that Baby Gap sizes things a little smaller than the rest of the world, and with hand-me-downs there's the matter of shrinkage to consider).
But I think Helena had fun. She took a real liking to the outfit from her great-grandfather: a hot pink ensemble consisting of a three-quarter-sleeve shirt/jacket and skirt/shorts. Helena chose to accessorize with my gray purse she pulled out of the closet and then wielded my cellphone, which really played up the whole power suit effect. A toddling mover and shaker.
I've been sneaking peeks at The World According to Mimi Smartypants for a couple days now. I managed to read the whole thing a couple pages at a time, when J-F was changing Helena's diaper, while I was tidying up and just happened to be moving this book from the stack in the bedroom to the pile on the kitchen table, reading it while giving it a mere sideways glance while pretending to watch TV. So now it's done, and I'm panicking that I have nothing to read on the train on Wednesday — sure, I can pick up a magazine at the train station, but I don't see a book-buying opportunity presenting itself before we leave.
I did enjoy the book, but I don't think Ms Smartypants would be offended to know I was a little disappointed. That's my own fault in a way — had I saved it for train-reading it would have served as a substitute for blog-reading. As it is, I can't think of a very good reason for reading this book, except for if you've never read her blog and don't have Internet access. Still, it was fun and easy, in the sense that I wouldn't be likely to read her blog archives straight through and in chronological order and it provides more — background? context? character? — just something more, to her current-day ramblings.
It's kind of creepy actually to be reading someone else's diary and at every other entry or so exclaiming "hey, that's me." Me too, I play violin! Me too, I edit medical stuff! Me too, I had a thing for Al Gore!
What's even creepier is that I seem to have adopted her cadence in writing this entry.
I will add to all this that for some reason I am inexplicably really, really, really bothered by the list of Dramatis Personae at the front of the book, which includes people mentioned within the book proper just once, as if a reader on first (and only) mention of a character couldn't glean from context that this was obviously someone she knows and occasionally has drinks with.
On the other hand, Helena is smitten with the black kitty-cat that adorns the dust jacket (in five places!). Silly, but true.
Mother's Day rocked. I am the luckiest woman alive to be the mother of that sweet, brilliant little creature. We did very little today, and even littler that was "special," but there was a little something in the air that made it magical.
Helena, as if she knew how Hallmark had designated this Sunday, an amazing feat for one not yet 18 months old, was full of spontaneous hugs and kisses.
The three of us went to the park. A very busy park day it was. It seemed a lot of suburban families treated their moms to a picnic in the city today. Didn't they move to the suburbs for the wide green spaces? If you're going to come into the city for the day, why not enjoy one of those unique city experiences, like a nice restaurant or a museum? Do they not have proper parks in the suburbs? (Mind you, this park really is exquisite.)
Helena is perhaps still a little young for the park. The sign on the gate clearly states it's for 2- to 6-year-olds. Our last few visits she's been less a participant and more an observer. Perhaps she's had another one of those lightbulb moments, albeit a less obvious one to the casual observer (OK, to anyone. I am not a casual observer; I am her mother) — something that's made her go "hmmm" and hang back so she can test a theory or perfect a technique. Perhaps she's simply too tired to be rambunctious — she still can't make up her mind whether she wants one nap a day or two (today I had three!). (I'm toying with "scheduling" the park as a morning excursion so that she's not torn between napping and playing this way, giving them each a half-assed go.) I worry that she'll grow up to be an antisocial push-over, as are both her parents. But we're working on that.
After the park, we made a side trip to return the DVD we'd rented last night (Intolerable Cruelty — I enjoyed it immensely. Very funny, both witty and silly. And George and Catherine are sssoooo sexy.) and J-F bought me a Mr. Freeze (blue) at the dĆ©panneur cuz it was almost hot outside. I had a lot of those the summer I was pregnant, but only maybe two last year. Something in the flavour makes my throat very scratchy. We found a 1-800 number on the wrapper and decided that I should call (does anyone ever call? would anyone answer?), but I promptly forgot and threw the wrapper away into the first trashcan we passed.
The only out-of-the-ordinary thing we did today was play dress-up. Kind of. Helena did the wearing, I did the dressing (J-F didn't participate). I feel like I've spent a whole month already sorting through her wardrobe: stashing away winter things and clothes that have stayed in her drawers since even before the snow; sorting those things into stuff to give away and stuff to hang on to "just in case"; pulling out season- and size-appropriate clothing from the boxes of hand-me-downs friends have given us, as well as clothing received as gifts going as far back as the baby shower. It's a tricky matter of timing, cuz today I find myself trying stuff on Helena, hoping it's not too late, hoping I haven't let a particularly fantastic gift go to waste simply by not reading the size on the label (remembering too that Baby Gap sizes things a little smaller than the rest of the world, and with hand-me-downs there's the matter of shrinkage to consider).
But I think Helena had fun. She took a real liking to the outfit from her great-grandfather: a hot pink ensemble consisting of a three-quarter-sleeve shirt/jacket and skirt/shorts. Helena chose to accessorize with my gray purse she pulled out of the closet and then wielded my cellphone, which really played up the whole power suit effect. A toddling mover and shaker.
I've been sneaking peeks at The World According to Mimi Smartypants for a couple days now. I managed to read the whole thing a couple pages at a time, when J-F was changing Helena's diaper, while I was tidying up and just happened to be moving this book from the stack in the bedroom to the pile on the kitchen table, reading it while giving it a mere sideways glance while pretending to watch TV. So now it's done, and I'm panicking that I have nothing to read on the train on Wednesday — sure, I can pick up a magazine at the train station, but I don't see a book-buying opportunity presenting itself before we leave.
I did enjoy the book, but I don't think Ms Smartypants would be offended to know I was a little disappointed. That's my own fault in a way — had I saved it for train-reading it would have served as a substitute for blog-reading. As it is, I can't think of a very good reason for reading this book, except for if you've never read her blog and don't have Internet access. Still, it was fun and easy, in the sense that I wouldn't be likely to read her blog archives straight through and in chronological order and it provides more — background? context? character? — just something more, to her current-day ramblings.
It's kind of creepy actually to be reading someone else's diary and at every other entry or so exclaiming "hey, that's me." Me too, I play violin! Me too, I edit medical stuff! Me too, I had a thing for Al Gore!
What's even creepier is that I seem to have adopted her cadence in writing this entry.
I will add to all this that for some reason I am inexplicably really, really, really bothered by the list of Dramatis Personae at the front of the book, which includes people mentioned within the book proper just once, as if a reader on first (and only) mention of a character couldn't glean from context that this was obviously someone she knows and occasionally has drinks with.
On the other hand, Helena is smitten with the black kitty-cat that adorns the dust jacket (in five places!). Silly, but true.
Friday, May 07, 2004
Disney denial
Michael Eisner claims the decision not to distribute Michael Moore's Farenheit 911 was not related to politics.
Strangely, no alternative explanation for the action is offered.
Strangely, no alternative explanation for the action is offered.
Don't panic
Bookslut features a review of Neil Gaiman's biography of Don’t Panic: Douglas Adams and the Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy.
It feels as if you casually ran into Neil Gaiman at a pub, bought a round, and giggle like a fangirl over the behind-the-scenes book legends of The Hitchhiker’s Guide. . .
Don’t Panic is a book about the life of an idea, not the life of an author. Gaiman follows the career of Douglas Adams in relationship to the Hitchhiker phenomena, rather than focusing on Adam’s personal life.
Sounds like fun. Sadly, not available in paperback in time to enjoy on my upcoming train trip.
It feels as if you casually ran into Neil Gaiman at a pub, bought a round, and giggle like a fangirl over the behind-the-scenes book legends of The Hitchhiker’s Guide. . .
Don’t Panic is a book about the life of an idea, not the life of an author. Gaiman follows the career of Douglas Adams in relationship to the Hitchhiker phenomena, rather than focusing on Adam’s personal life.
Sounds like fun. Sadly, not available in paperback in time to enjoy on my upcoming train trip.
Too much TV makes me nervous
Salon today has a reaction to the study of a few weeks ago connecting TV watching to attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder.
The media were not content to announce merely that an activity enjoyed in 98 percent of American homes, according to the Census Bureau, has been associated with a neurobiological disorder. . . They took the concept an alarming step further.
Most of the article demonstrates the sort of confounding factors that lead to confusing correlation and causation.
Should I let Helena watch television? How much? What kind? What if I ruin her, create a monster?
One expert assures me it's OK to feel guilt: "Being a parent is the most profound moral responsibility anybody has. If you didn't feel guilty 90 percent of the time, you wouldn't be a moral person." But she doesn't say it's OK to watch TV.
If only someone would definitively say TV is bad for you. Then the government could intervene for the sake of the children, for everybody's well-being, and confiscate all our television sets. That would be much easier.
The media were not content to announce merely that an activity enjoyed in 98 percent of American homes, according to the Census Bureau, has been associated with a neurobiological disorder. . . They took the concept an alarming step further.
Most of the article demonstrates the sort of confounding factors that lead to confusing correlation and causation.
Should I let Helena watch television? How much? What kind? What if I ruin her, create a monster?
One expert assures me it's OK to feel guilt: "Being a parent is the most profound moral responsibility anybody has. If you didn't feel guilty 90 percent of the time, you wouldn't be a moral person." But she doesn't say it's OK to watch TV.
If only someone would definitively say TV is bad for you. Then the government could intervene for the sake of the children, for everybody's well-being, and confiscate all our television sets. That would be much easier.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)